| The Missing Link |
|
|
|
|
By James Reilly Part of the mystique of Koi exists in the fact that this unique race of carp developed in one tiny place on the planet. Yet we know that modern common carp have occupied an extensive area of Eurasia for thousands of years. So how did one species of drab, common carp become 13 distinct varieties of Koi with scores of pattern and color variations within those varieties? Is it possible there was a ‘missing link’ in Japan that made for the bridge between common black carp and the colorful Koi carp of today?In this article I would like to explore some facts, historical evidence and theories as to just how the common carp came to be the Nishikigoi of today. There are many accounts and plausible explanations as to how common carp came to early Japan. Some suggest that carp were natural residents of Japan, but the fossil record does not support that theory. Others credit the early Asian immigrants who crossed the ancient land bridge that connected the Asian mainland to the southwestern Japanese islands for the early introduction of the common carp. Still others emphasize the centuries of trading with China, Korea and, eventually, the Europeans, as the most likely source for the introduction of western and eastern subspecies of common carp.Whatever the true source of common carp is, the breeder record shows there are three easily recognized types of common carp responsible for the rise of the fancy brocade carp clan. These types of common carp likely represented regional population variations created by isolation of breeding populations. The early Japanese breeders talk about these three varieties in basic descriptive terms: The Magoi was the black, or prototype, common carp, and the variations were the Asagi Magoi, the Duro, or Mud, Magoi, and the Tetsu, or Iron, Magoi. Skipping ahead for a moment in our quest for answers, the road map as to how the varieties of Nishikigoi were created is the stuff of modern times. In fact, most varieties are no older than 100-120 years, and many are creations of the post-World War II era. How do we know this? Fortunately, we have the names of the Koi themselves, as well as a clear chronological record of Japan’s important and significant eras to verify and date all of these details.
ErasIt is not the intention of this article to go into great detail regarding the history of Japan. But some discussion of Japanese history is required to appreciate the world from which Nishikigoi arises. The chronological eras of Japan are based on both natural and human events.• The Edo era (1603-1867), for instance, sometimes called the Tokugawa era,represents a ruling family period, as well as an important historical figure’s political life. It is this ruling clan that gave us, much later, the legendary concept of Gosanke (the “Big Three”), the ruling gene/blood families of Nishikigoi. Indeed, the second half of this era (1781- 1829) is a fertile time for Koi development. • The Meiji era (1867-1912) represents a time of reform and a time when future eras would be associated with the reign of an individual emperor rather than a natural event or a dynasty. It is during this period that many important genotypes were fixed in the Nishikigoi gene pool. • Adding to this rich Koi history, it is during the Taisho era (1912-1926) and the Showa era (1926- 1989) that modern Sanke and Showa first are recognized and named appropriately to honor the era in which they were establishment and stabilized. • The Heisei era (1989-present) is the current time period, reflecting a time when the focus is on improvement of existing varieties, as opposed to the singular focus on creating new varieties. When Did It Happen?
Typical MutationsThe answer to this question can be found in the natural mutation process appearing in the carp populations of Japan. Carp are a very prolific species, producing thousands of offspring per breeding pair. And the isolated Japanese Magoi populations were typical in that they produced thousands of fry per year within the reservoirs and rice paddies of northwestern Japan. But, unlike other areas and other times in which carp populations existed, the isolated carp populations of that region of Japan were anything but typical. It was in this region that mutation was produced in number, identified and then nurtured by the local villagers. Others suggest the soil of the region contributed to physiological change in the skin of the local carp. Still others suggest that identification of color oddities, and selection of these unique spontaneous forms and the systematic concentration of these like-oddities in limited bodies of water, all contributed to rapid emergence of a number of morphs of the common carp. All this occurred within a very limited geographical region. The Higoi mentioned We may never know or be able to prove one unified theory for just how this small gene pool could have produced a significant number of these missing links, or how long the actual process took. But, fortunately, we can now identify those early mutations based on our modern understanding of common and universal mutations. It’s All About The Melanin
In a normal individual, this dermal pigment is produced within specialized cells known as melanocytes. In mutated individuals, however, DNA defects in normal skin melanin production cause one of several different changes in the skin and, therefore, the look, or phenotype, of that individual changes dramatically. Perhaps most widely recognized of these phenotypes is the albino. Is This The Missing Link? Of all the mutations we have discussed, perhaps the most important are the all white mutations, often referred to in the modern form as Shiro Muji. In some individuals, there is a genetic condition in which all color pigments are reduced or eliminated in the skin. And, unlike in an albino, where only melanin is reduced, in this mutation all types of color pigment are reduced or eliminated,leaving a colorless, or white, fish. Because all pigment cells develop in the embryo from the same embryonic cell type, if there is a genetic mutation at that level, the resulting phenotype can potentially be absent of all color.Another obvious difference between albino and this condition is eye color. In the albino, there is no black pigment, so the eye will only show a pink color, resulting from reflections of blood circulation within and behind the eye. In the all-white individual, the eye will remain black, as the tissue behind the eye is generated from another group of embryonic cells that is unaffected by this particular type of mutation.The term for this genetic defect or mutation is leucism. This condition can be complete and involve all the skin covering the entire body, or it can be restricted and only involve certain areas of the skin. It is this mutation that gave the Nishikigoi the ability to produce a new base color and also to produce one of the four known types of pattern. This mutation is key to the rise of Nishikigoi and, therefore, our missing link for white-based Koi. To this day, the typical white-based Nishikigoi spawn will have a percentage of individuals that revert to the basic mutation of an all-white fish. And, as further evidence of the ‘missing link’ theory, it would be very difficult for the Shiro Muji to revert back to a Magoi when bred Shiro Muji to Shiro Muji. Sometimes, with leucism, a subdivision occurs and the absence of pigment(white areas) is restricted, or localized, to certain areas. This results in a Koi having entire areas of white on an otherwise normal colored or solid mutation, such as black. It was the Karasugoi and all its progressive varieties that showed this basic mutant condition best. This condition, known as pied or piebald, is a trait that gave rise to the dorsal pattern we see today. Early pictures and drawing of Koi will clearly show this genetic condition. I encourage the serious student of Nishikigoi to study the drawings from the 1914 Tokyo exhibition to better envision the piebald trait in early Nishikigoi. This genetic trait has several distinct orientations. Some genetic variations produce large islands, or plates, of pattern, and others produce a more wrapped pattern. A third variation produces a lateral pattern. Master breeders and advanced hobbyist judges can cull a fish today based on the primitive or advanced nature of a recognized piebald trait. This demonstrates the true rarity of some patterns and the odds against certain symmetry in nature. In The End It is fascinating to realize that 150 years ago, simple country people understood the mutations we are discussing today simply by applying observation and timeto the breeding process. Long before scientific terms and the big picture of genetic manipulation were applied to the process, these breeders created a system and an understanding of just how mutations worked within a greater breeding plan. As a result, Koi organizations such as ZNA teach that all Koi have one of two color bases (black or white), and that all varieties of Koi come in one of four different patterns (solid, dorsal, wrapped and lateral). And from this orientation come the 13 varieties. We could not have and enjoy the varieties ofKoi we see today if not for the emergence and isolation of the fundamental mutations and morphs that emerged in a small, isolated gene pool of drab common carp known as Magoi. It was those few oddities of nature that, through preservation, selective breeding and aggressive culling, lead to the modern Nishikigoi. These missing links are still with us in the white skin, the deep Sumi and the brilliant red patterns of today’s best Koi. |








If we now step back again in time and take a glimpse at the progression of Nishikigoi in the very early days, and specifically focus on the missing link mystery, we see that the story of modern Nishikigoi begins with Asagi. Since all of modern Koi arose from a few unique forms, followed by a concentrated breeding program, the Asagi, as a natural mutation,is a key player in the creation of many varieties. Asagi was present as a recognizable and ‘named variety’ of carp as far back as the Edo period. The most important trait for the purposes of this time line is the fact that the Asagi existed alongside the Matsuba. The Matsuba’s scales are bordered with black, like the wildtype Magoi. But the old Asagi had scales with a border of white. This is an important distinction, as the traits of modern Koi are beginning to emerge with the appearance of Asagi.
In a parallel story,the villagers of Niigata (1804-1829) found nature mutations within Magoi stock. These red carp, or Higoi, were concentratedon for 20 years until a scarlet carp was created. It was this stock of mutations that refined and added to modern Asagi, and later lead to the creation of a red and white fish when crossed with yet another mutation. These are perhaps the first real crossings of mutations leading toward a new look. From here, the varieties began to explode in the late Edo and early Meiji period. We not only see modern Asagi as a refinement of mutation, we see Ki Utsuri, Shiro Muji (an improved mutation) and the Sarasa (forerunner of the modern Kohaku and the cross of two mutations).
The first mutations were likely carp of a solid or a mottled white color, pale yellow, jet black or orange, or an orange/ black mottled color. These fundamental morphs are known by zoologists and geneticists to be common among some varieties of the carp family and other lower life forms. In addition, there are some early references to these colors and patterns in early Japanese literature.
Of all the mutations we have discussed, perhaps the most important are the all white mutations, often referred to in the modern form as Shiro Muji. In some individuals, there is a genetic condition in which all color pigments are reduced or eliminated in the skin. And, unlike in an albino, where only melanin is reduced, in this mutation all types of color pigment are reduced or eliminated,leaving a colorless, or white, fish. Because all pigment cells develop in the embryo from the same embryonic cell type, if there is a genetic mutation at that level, the resulting phenotype can potentially be absent of all color.
Sometimes, with leucism, a subdivision occurs and the absence of pigment
It is fascinating to realize that 150 years ago, simple country people understood the mutations we are discussing today simply by applying observation and time